SMMRY.ai TL;D[R|W|L] Made Easy!

CategoryKen White [The Popehat Report]

Can I Wear a MAGA Hat To My Government Job? [Ken White, Popehat]

C

• The Ninth Circuit recently ruled in Dodge v. Evergreen School District that Eric Dodge, a sixth-grade teacher from Vancouver, Washington, was entitled to a trial on his claim that school district officials violated his First Amendment rights by threatening to discipline him for wearing a MAGA hat to teacher training.
• The First Amendment protects public employees differently depending on whether the government is wearing its sovereign hat or its employer hat.
• To show a violation of the First Amendment, a public employee must show that the state actor engaged in an “adverse employment action” against the plaintiff as a result of their speech.
• The government must establish that it had a legitimate administrative interest in preventing or punishing the speech that outweighed the employee’s interest in exercising their First Amendment rights.
• The more the employee’s speech resembles core First Amendment expression (like political speech), the harder it is for the government to make this showing.
• Even when First Amendment rights are violated, there may not be a remedy due to the judicially created doctrine of “qualified immunity.”

Published January 12, 2023. Visit Popehat to read Ken White’s original post.

Hamline University And Cancel Culture [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

H

• Hamline University’s decision to not renew the contract of an art history lecturer who showed an image of the Prophet Muhammad in class is an example of “cancel culture” – a response that is disproportionate to the speech in question.
• Hamline’s communications about the incident, which downplayed free expression and academic freedom, were also an example of “cancel culture”.
• Hamline’s student newspaper, the Oracle, engaged in “cancel culture” by deleting a statement from the chair of the Department of Religion defending the lecturer.
• Actionable items to address this type of “cancel culture” include: not firing, disciplining, or non-renewing teachers based on violating sectarian religious rules unless the teachers and students know up front they’re under those rules; not condemning pedagogically appropriate and on-point teaching to soothe sectarian demands; and not issuing vague, ambiguous, and unworkable speech “standards”.
• Student newspapers at non-sectarian schools should not delete defenses of speech because some people think it’s offensive to disagree about whether the speech is offensive.
• The Hamline students’ response to a lecturer showing a picture of the Prophet Muhammad was disproportionate and censorial, and can be fairly called “cancel culture”.
• Demanding that the lecturer be fired, not renewed, or disciplined is wildly disproportionate and should not be condoned.
• Saying “as a Muslim I find visual depictions of the Prophet offensive and blasphemous” is not cancel culture.
• Throwing around the word “Islamophobia” is censorial, entitled, and ignorant, but not wildly disproportionate.
• The criticism of the lecturer is indecent, as the lecturer showed sensitivity and explained the pedagogical context.
• This incident is a huge culture war victory for the anti-progressive Right.

Published January 5, 2023. Visit The Popehat Report to read Ken White’s original post.

Clarifying Some Common First Amendment Terminology [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

C
  • When First Amendment experts say “First Amendment exception,” they’re generally referring to the limited, historical set of exceptions to the First Amendment that allow the government to limit speech based on its content.
  • The exceptions aren’t exceptions to the proposition “the government can’t do anything to restrict anything that might be understood as speech,” because that’s not the rule.
  • When we say “this is a First Amendment issue” or “the First Amendment applies to this dispute,” we’re saying “there’s a set of law based on the First Amendment that you have to apply to this dispute to resolve it.”
  • This doesn’t mean “the person speaking automatically wins” any more than “you have a right to trial by jury if you’re charged with a crime” means that you have a right to be found not guilty.
  • We have to apply the relevant First Amendment test to determine if the speech falls into the incitement exception to the First Amendment.

Published December 30, 2022

Visit The Popehat Report to read Ken White’s original post

Can A Tarot Card Reading Be Defamatory? [Ken White, Serious Matters]

C
  • Defamation requires a provably false statement of fact, not an opinion, insult, hyperbole, or rhetoric.
  • Professor Rebecca Scofield of the University of Idaho is suing Ashley Guillard, a Tik-Tok personality, for defamation after Guillard released a series of TikTok videos accusing Scofield of plotting and ordering the murders of four students at the University.
  • The question arises whether it is defamatory to offer an opinion based on magic, such as tarot card readings.
  • Professor Scofield may have an easier time proving defamation based on statements made by Guillard that do not explicitly reference tarot card readings.

Click HERE for original. Published December 29, 2022

“The First Amendment Isn’t Absolute.” Sure, But So What? [Ken White, Serious Matters]

  • The First Amendment has established limits, but these limits are well-defined and narrowly limited.
  • The Supreme Court has repeatedly listed the First Amendment exceptions, which include obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, and speech integral to criminal conduct.
  • The Supreme Court has stated that it will not create new exceptions to the First Amendment by balancing the harm of speech against its value.
  • The established First Amendment exceptions must be interpreted according to existing law, and cannot be used to mean whatever one wants them to mean.

Click HERE for original. Published December 24, 2022

How Did Sam Bankman-Fried Get Bail? [Ken White, Serious Matters]

H
  • Sam Bankman-Fried was released on bail shortly after agreeing to extradition to the US.
  • The bail terms include home detention with an ankle monitor, intensive pretrial supervision, surrendering of passport, and financial restrictions.
  • A total bond of $250 million was set, with his parents co-signing and two non-parent sureties to follow.
  • His parents must also post their home equity by January 12th.
  • The bail is a surprisingly good deal for a person accused of a multi-billion dollar fraud, and is consistent with federal bail laws.

Click HERE for original. Published December 23, 2022

In Defense Of Free Speech Pedantry [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

I
  • Free speech values can be divided into three categories: free speech rights (FSR), free speech culture (FSC), and speech decency (SD).
  • Clarity in distinguishing between these three values helps to clarify the different rights and interests in play.
  • Being precise about which free speech value is being discussed is important and can lead to a better understanding of the law and to more effective debates about cultural issues.

Click HERE for original. Published December 18, 2022

Goodbye, Twitter [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

G
  • Ken White is leaving Twitter due to its recent changes and his disagreement with the brand they are exhibiting.
  • He has been on the internet since 1995, meeting his wife on Usenet and participating in many different communities.
  • White has been advocating for the exercise of free speech and free association, and is now voting with his feet by leaving Twitter.
  • People can still find him on Facebook, Substack, Post.News, Mastodon and by email.

Click HERE for original. Published December 12, 2022

A Farewell To A Friend [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

A
  • Ken White wrote a farewell to his long-time co-blogger and friend, Patrick, who passed away
  • The two first met online through a gaming forum in 2001 and wrote on Popehat together for more than a decade
  • Patrick was passionate about fairness and decency and the obligations of the powerful to the powerless
  • Patrick helped reason White through crisis in 2014 and White talked Patrick through low points thereafter
  • White never met Patrick face to face, but they forged a close friendship and Patrick’s death is a shock
  • White hopes that such a friendship is possible, and that it shows anything is possible

Click HERE for original. Published September 19, 2022

Who Judges The Judges? [Ken White, The Popehat Report]

W
  • Ken White reflects on a difficult experience from his past, when as a young lawyer he and his colleagues had to confront a judge they respected who was suffering from alcoholism.
  • The judge’s colleagues, some of whom were close friends, refused to take action, leaving it to the young staff members to take a difficult stand.
  • The judge eventually took leave and never returned, but Ken White still wonders if he did the right thing and if he should have done it a different way.

Click HERE for original. Published August 12, 2022

SMMRY.ai TL;D[R|W|L] Made Easy!
Please Signup
    Strength: Very Weak
     
    Powered by ARMember
      (Unlicensed)

    Follow SMMRY.AI on Twitter


    All Tags

    Advertising AI Amazon Antitrust Apple Art Arts & Culture Asia Autobiography Biden Big Tech Budget Deficit Celebrities ChatGPT China Chips Christmas Climate Change Community Congress Covid Crime Criminal Justice Crypto Culture Wars DEI Democrats Demographics DeSantis Economic Development Education (College/University) Education (K-12) Elections Elon Musk Energy Environment Espionage Europe Federal Reserve Florida Free Speech Gender Geopolitics Germany Global Economics Globalization Google Government Health History Housing Market Immigration India Inequality Inflation Infrastructure Innovation Intel Labor Market Law Legal LGBTQ Macroeconomics Media Medicine Mental Health Meta Microsoft Military Movies & TV Music News Roundup NFL Oceans OpenAI Parenting Pregnancy Psychology Public Health Race Recession Religion Renewables Republicans Research Russia Science Social Media Software Space Sports State law Supreme Court Trump Twitter Ukraine US Business US Economy US Politics US Taxes