SMMRY.ai TL;D[R|W|L] Made Easy!

TagAntitrust

An Interview with Eric Seufert About Meta’s Earnings and the Google-DOJ Case [Ben Thompson, Stratechery]

A

• Eric Seufert discussed Meta’s earnings and the Google-DOJ case.
• Meta’s earnings showed a decrease in revenue but a skyrocketing stock price.
• Seufert discussed the importance of increasing impressions and the corresponding decrease in price, as it crowds out competitors and provides more room to grow.
• He also discussed the four ways to increase ad revenue for an ad platform: increasing ad load, increasing reach, increasing the value generated by ads, and increasing time spent on site.
• Facebook has managed to increase engagement and ad load, and has introduced new ad placements to increase the value generated by ads.
• Increased ad load on Reels is justified, as it had no ads before.
• Facebook has created new ad formats, such as click-to-messaging, which have the potential to convert better than other ad formats.
• AI and machine learning are being used to automate the process of managing campaigns, eliminating human error and inefficiency.
• The black box automation suite, Advantage Plus, is used to test different permutations of audiences and creative to find the right mix.
• The application of AI and machine learning is more compelling from the advertising side than the consumer side.
• Generative AI can be used to create assets and interpret what works and what doesn’t.
• The end game is for Facebook to integrate these tools and do it for the advertiser.
• The duopoly of Google and Facebook is over, as brand advertising is moving onto the web from TV in a meaningful way.
Amazon is the one big exception, and ATT has been an accelerant for their ad business.
• Apple and Amazon are capturing direct response budget that has fled from Facebook.
• Facebook is trying to recapture some of those dollars by improving efficiency and engagement, and taking more of the human element away.
• Facebook reintroduced 28-day click attribution reporting, which is modeled, in order to comply with ATT.
• SKAdNetwork 4.0 is more signal, and the biggest platforms will benefit most from it.
• Apple may be shooting themselves in the foot with ATT, as they benefit from in-app purchases.
• ATT has caused a difficult transition for mobile gaming, but Apple may start providing better measurements and signals to help developers.
• Facebook’s earnings results validate the ATT Recession thesis, with revenue down 4% year-over-year.
• Recent decisions in Europe have been problematic for ad targeting, with Meta not allowed to use a contractual basis to get user agreement for ads, WhatsApp not allowed to use first party data for general analytics and security, and Voodoo Games not allowed to use the IDFV.
• The European Union is not likely to allow companies to offer services on terms they don’t want, and this could lead to decreased monetization in Europe.
• Activists and special interests may prevent the right thing from being done, preventing the use of AI technologies.
• The DOJ’s case against Google is that it used its end-to-end ownership of the ad tech stack to suppress competition and prevent other companies from being able to compete.
• The DOJ’s argument is flawed because it portrays supply as chasing demand, when in reality, it is the other way around.
• The DOJ’s chief harm demonstration is that publishers made more money than they should have, which is the only part in the stack where there is arguably lock-in.
• The counterfactual is not that advertisers would have gotten more margin on their ad spend, but that they would have been starved from incremental conversions if Google had not made this available at all.
• The remedy proposed by the DOJ is to split off the exchange and the publisher tool, which highlights the weakness in the case itself because Google Ads are first and foremost for Google Properties.
• Facebook is building up customer engagement to attract advertisers.
• Google divesting Google Ad Manager and AdX could lead to lower prices for publishers and higher prices for advertisers.
• Google is acting as a market maker, pricing long-tail traffic that would otherwise go unsold.
• Google’s data gives them an advantage in pricing, and they may be keeping the third-party ad business alive for the data rather than the revenue.
• Stricter privacy regulations benefit larger companies with more signal.
• Advertisers choose Google because they have no choice, but if Google had been more transparent about their practices, they may not be in as much trouble.

Published February 2, 2023
Visit Stratechery to read Ben Thompson’s original post An Interview with Eric Seufert About Meta’s Earnings and the Google-DOJ Case

DOJ Sues Google, Google’s Advertising Aggregation, No Duty to Deal [Ben Thompson, Stratechery]

D

• The DOJ has filed a lawsuit against Google, alleging that the company has abused its role as one of the largest brokers, suppliers, and online auctioneers of ads placed on websites and mobile applications.
• The lawsuit seeks to unwind Google’s “anticompetitive acquisitions” and calls for the divestiture of its ad exchange.
• Google has used its market power to force more publishers and advertisers to use its products while disrupting their ability to use competing products effectively.
• Google’s power in digital advertising stems from a series of acquisitions, beginning with the company’s $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick in 2008.
• Google has capitalized on its well-known search engine to start a profitable search advertising business, Google Ads (formerly AdWords).
• Google Ads’ unique and sizeable advertiser demand is what makes Google’s ad exchange unavoidable for most website publishers.
• A 2014 Google experiment found that more than half of the impressions that publishers offered on its ad exchange would go unsold without the critical Google Ads’ demand.
• Google has effectively locked out meaningful competition in the digital advertising industry by leveraging its control of the “operating system” of advertising.
• Google has Aggregated the long tail of advertisers, and that long tail is so large that no publisher can do without them.
• Google has then levered access to those advertisers into control of the “operating system” of advertising, and with that control systemically favored itself.
• Google shifted money from advertisers to publishers by submitting two bids for ad slots from Google Ads, which systematically increased the winning price for an ad.
• Google’s defense is the “no duty to deal” argument, which is based on the Supreme Court case Verizon v. Trinko.
• The most likely outcome is that this case highlights exactly where current law is deficient in limiting big tech companies.

Published January 25, 2023
Visit Stratechery to read Ben Thompson’s original post DOJ Sues Google, Google’s Advertising Aggregation, No Duty to Deal

Google’s most serious antitrust challenge to date [Casey Newton, Platformer]

G

• The US Justice Department and 8 states have filed a major antitrust case against Google, accusing the company of maintaining an illegal monopoly over the online ad business.
• The lawsuit calls for Google to divest its Google Ad Manager suite, including both its publisher ad server and ad exchange.
• Google has faced a steady drumbeat of regulators accusing it of antitrust violations since 2017, when the European Commission fined the company a then-record $2.73 billion.
• Google’s estimated 26.5 percent share of the US digital ad market is down more than 10 percent from its peak in 2015, due to the growth of Meta and Amazon.
• The lawsuit claims that Google’s fees on its ad exchanges allow it to keep 30 cents out of every dollar spent on them, resulting in overcharges of $100 million for federal agencies.
• The case is rooted in real harms and is in line with traditional thinking about the point of antitrust law, which is to protect consumers.

Published January 25, 2023
Visit Platformer to read Casey Newton’s original post Google’s most serious antitrust challenge to date

SMMRY.ai TL;D[R|W|L] Made Easy!
Please Signup
    Strength: Very Weak
     
    Powered by ARMember
      (Unlicensed)

    Follow SMMRY.AI on Twitter


    All Tags

    Advertising AI Amazon Antitrust Apple Art Arts & Culture Asia Autobiography Biden Big Tech Budget Deficit Celebrities ChatGPT China Chips Christmas Climate Change Community Congress Covid Crime Criminal Justice Crypto Culture Wars DEI Democrats Demographics DeSantis Economic Development Education (College/University) Education (K-12) Elections Elon Musk Energy Environment Espionage Europe Federal Reserve Florida Free Speech Gender Geopolitics Germany Global Economics Globalization Google Government Health History Housing Market Immigration India Inequality Inflation Infrastructure Innovation Intel Labor Market Law Legal LGBTQ Macroeconomics Media Medicine Mental Health Meta Microsoft Military Movies & TV Music News Roundup NFL Oceans OpenAI Parenting Pregnancy Psychology Public Health Race Recession Religion Renewables Republicans Research Russia Science Social Media Software Space Sports State law Supreme Court Trump Twitter Ukraine US Business US Economy US Politics US Taxes